Today in History:
Target Security Info.
The Target chain is consumer unfriendly and not deserving of customer patronage or employee loyalty. FYI just take a look at the various complaint sites at www.badbureau.com by searching their data base for: Target Stores, Target Corporation or Target to find the various horor stories posted by dissatisfied customers and employees. You might also look at the site www.my3centsworth.com or any other internet complaint site such as: http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/targetsucks .
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Target Corp loses a long running case in Oklahoma!
Target Corp loses a long running case in Oklahoma!
Therrien v. Target Corporation
On Feb 19th the case that has bounced around since approx 3/06 was resolved with a verdict against the Target Corporation for $500,000 (+15K in costs).
You might recall that last year it was dismissed after Target put on its case and before Therrien’s case could be presented. The matter was appealed on the basis that the Federal Judge James Payne had not considered the new changes to Oklahoma statutes and had thur ruled incorrectly. So the case was retired with the result that Target lost. (of course they also can appeal)
Briefly: "Plaintiff claims damages for injuries suffered as an invitee upon Defendant’s premises as the result of a criminal assault."
Translation: a good samaritan came to assist a Tarbutt screwup security weenie who was having a problem arresting a shoplifter, and had called out for help from anyone, the helpful customer (Timothy Therrien) ended up knifed and as usual this screwed up company wouldn't compensate the man for his serious injuries.
The moral of this story is: TARGET SUCKS. It was a lot of work for Therrien for a rather low award, but it is nice to finally see that he was the winner in this. You might be interested in knowing that the Target AP Directives were used against Target (I sent them a copy) and also a lot of other AP information was obtained and entered in the case.